SHRABAN KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SURAJ DEO MUNDA — A.B.A./1864/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 316,318(4),303(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 05th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010094172026
Filing Number
A.B.A./6113/2026
Filing Date
19-Mar-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./1864/2026
Registration Date
01-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 482 ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRABAN KUMAR
Adv. VIKESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SURAJ DEO MUNDA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Case Summary: A.B.A. 1864/2026 The Jharkhand High Court rejected Shraban Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a truck theft case involving intoxication of the driver (IPC Sections 406, 420, 379). Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi denied bail citing Kumar's criminal antecedent and his alleged role as an accomplice of two co-accused who administered the intoxicant and stole the vehicle, despite Kumar's claims of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
28-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
21-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
30-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./1864/2026
Case Summary: A.B.A. 1864/2026 The Jharkhand High Court rejected Shraban Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a truck theft case involving intoxication of the driver (IPC Sections 406, 420, 379). Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi denied bail citing Kumar's criminal antecedent and his alleged role as an accomplice of two co-accused who administered the intoxicant and stole the vehicle, despite Kumar's claims of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts