KARAMCHAND MAHTO vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JITENDRA PANDEY — B.A./2837/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302,34,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010093672026
Filing Number
B.A./6085/2026
Filing Date
19-Mar-2026
Registration No
B.A./2837/2026
Registration Date
04-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KARAMCHAND MAHTO
Adv. VISHAL KUMAR,ISHAANI SINGH,ISHAANI SINGH, ,ISHAANI SINGH
-
2.GOVIND MAHTO
-
3.KARAN MAHTO
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JITENDRA PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. 2837/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted regular bail to Karamchand Mahto, Govind Mahto, and Karan Mahto in a murder case (IPC §302/34) arising from a land dispute. Justice Rajesh Kumar ordered their release on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each, noting that co-accused persons had already received bail and that the applicants possess the disputed land, coupled with their undertaking to participate in trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
08-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
01-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./2837/2026
Case Summary: B.A. 2837/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted regular bail to Karamchand Mahto, Govind Mahto, and Karan Mahto in a murder case (IPC §302/34) arising from a land dispute. Justice Rajesh Kumar ordered their release on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each, noting that co-accused persons had already received bail and that the applicants possess the disputed land, coupled with their undertaking to participate in trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts