BIJAY KUMAR DEY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRIYA SHRESTHA — A.B.A./2295/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 420,467,468,471,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010093352026

Filing Number

A.B.A./6056/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2295/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 420,467,468,471,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIJAY KUMAR DEY

    Adv. ANISH KUMAR MISHRA,SUMAN ROY,SUMAN ROY, ,SUMAN ROY

  2. 2.SANGEETA DEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRIYA SHRESTHA

  2. 2.VIJAY KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    Summary of A.B.A. No. 2295/2026: The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Bijay Kumar Dey and Sangeeta Dey, who faced charges under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 for allegedly obtaining a bank loan using a forged sale-deed. The court found that the loan had already been settled as evidenced by a bank certificate and granted bail on furnishing Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties, directing surrender within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2295/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of A.B.A. No. 2295/2026: The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Bijay Kumar Dey and Sangeeta Dey, who faced charges under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 for allegedly obtaining a bank loan using a forged sale-deed. The court found that the loan had already been settled as evidenced by a bank certificate and granted bail on furnishing Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties, directing surrender within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case