PAWAN DAS ALIAS PAWAN KUMAR DAS vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR — Cr.M.P./1184/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th June 2026.

CNR: JHHC010093242026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./6045/2026

Filing Date

19-03-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1184/2026

Registration Date

23-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

Restoration ( 18 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528

Petitioner(s)

PAWAN DAS ALIAS PAWAN KUMAR DAS

Adv. LALIT YADAV

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

15-04-2026

LAWAZIMA

06-05-2026

Admission

10-06-2026

Admission

13-05-2026

Admission

Orders

10-06-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

The Jharkhand High Court allowed petitioner Pawan Das's petition to restore Bail Application No. 10949 of 2025, which was dismissed on 17.02.2026 due to counsel's non-appearance. Justice Sanjay Prasad granted restoration after counsel undertook to remain vigilant, particularly considering the petitioner had been in custody since 22.09.2025 and the dismissal resulted from inadvertence rather than merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court allowed petitioner Pawan Das's petition to restore Bail Application No. 10949 of 2025, which was dismissed on 17.02.2026 due to counsel's non-appearance. Justice Sanjay Prasad granted restoration after counsel undertook to remain vigilant, particularly considering the petitioner had been in custody since 22.09.2025 and the dismissal resulted from inadvertence rather than merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case