PAWAN DAS ALIAS PAWAN KUMAR DAS vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR — Cr.M.P./1184/2026
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010093242026
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./6045/2026
Filing Date
19-Mar-2026
Registration No
Cr.M.P./1184/2026
Registration Date
23-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
Restoration ( 18 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PAWAN DAS ALIAS PAWAN KUMAR DAS
Adv. LALIT YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court allowed petitioner Pawan Das's petition to restore Bail Application No. 10949 of 2025, which was dismissed on 17.02.2026 due to counsel's non-appearance. Justice Sanjay Prasad granted restoration after counsel undertook to remain vigilant, particularly considering the petitioner had been in custody since 22.09.2025 and the dismissal resulted from inadvertence rather than merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
13-May-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
06-May-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
15-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.M.P./1184/2026
The Jharkhand High Court allowed petitioner Pawan Das's petition to restore Bail Application No. 10949 of 2025, which was dismissed on 17.02.2026 due to counsel's non-appearance. Justice Sanjay Prasad granted restoration after counsel undertook to remain vigilant, particularly considering the petitioner had been in custody since 22.09.2025 and the dismissal resulted from inadvertence rather than merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts