GEETANAJLI PANDEY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - LILY SAHAY — Cr.M.P./822/2024
Case under An Application U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 452,387,323,327,336,344,304A,404,406,504,506,34,IPC. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010092382024
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./6841/2024
Filing Date
14-03-2024
Registration No
Cr.M.P./822/2024
Registration Date
14-03-2024
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Quashing Matter ( 206 )
Sub-Category
Quashing of Order ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GEETANAJLI PANDEY
Adv. MANOJ KR CHOUBEY,MADHAV PRASAD,MADHAV PRASAD, ,MADHAV PRASAD
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - LILY SAHAY
BABLI
ASFAQ REJAUL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
LAWAZIMA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2024 | LAWAZIMA |
Orders
In Cr.M.P. No.822/2024, the High Court of Jharkhand directed notice to be issued to opposite parties 2 and 3, and ordered the petitioner to file requisites for service within two weeks, failing which the petition would be dismissed. The rule was made returnable within six weeks, with the case to be listed after receipt of service confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In Cr.M.P. No.822/2024, the High Court of Jharkhand directed notice to be issued to opposite parties 2 and 3, and ordered the petitioner to file requisites for service within two weeks, failing which the petition would be dismissed. The rule was made returnable within six weeks, with the case to be listed after receipt of service confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts