GEETANAJLI PANDEY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - LILY SAHAY — Cr.M.P./822/2024

Case under An Application U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 452,387,323,327,336,344,304A,404,406,504,506,34,IPC. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010092382024

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./6841/2024

Filing Date

14-Mar-2024

Registration No

Cr.M.P./822/2024

Registration Date

14-Mar-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Quashing Matter ( 206 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Order ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 452,387,323,327,336,344,304A,404,406,504,506,34,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GEETANAJLI PANDEY

    Adv. MANOJ KR CHOUBEY,MADHAV PRASAD,MADHAV PRASAD, ,MADHAV PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - LILY SAHAY

  2. 2.BABLI

  3. 3.ASFAQ REJAUL

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    In Cr.M.P. No.822/2024, the High Court of Jharkhand directed notice to be issued to opposite parties 2 and 3, and ordered the petitioner to file requisites for service within two weeks, failing which the petition would be dismissed. The rule was made returnable within six weeks, with the case to be listed after receipt of service confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  4. 17-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  5. 19-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  6. 09-May-2024

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  7. 14-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./822/2024

casestatus.in Summary

In Cr.M.P. No.822/2024, the High Court of Jharkhand directed notice to be issued to opposite parties 2 and 3, and ordered the petitioner to file requisites for service within two weeks, failing which the petition would be dismissed. The rule was made returnable within six weeks, with the case to be listed after receipt of service confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case