MANE KHARIA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN, ,PRIYA SHRESTHA — Cr.A(SJ)/304/2019

Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010092262019

Filing Number

Cr.A(SJ)/6684/2019

Filing Date

14-Mar-2019

Registration No

Cr.A(SJ)/304/2019

Registration Date

23-Mar-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

Section 374(2) & 389(1) 389(2) ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANE KHARIA

    Adv. MD. ZAID AHMED,RANISH KUMAR,RANISH KUMAR, ,RANISH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN, ,PRIYA SHRESTHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: Mane Kharia v. State of Jharkhand Cr.A(SJ) /304/2019 | Jharkhand High Court | May 5, 2026 The High Court partially allowed the appeal, upholding conviction under IPC Sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restraint) but quashing the conviction under Section 324 (voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapon). The court found that while the appellant used a lathi (which is not a dangerous weapon) and caused only simple injuries without grievous harm, conviction under Section 324 could not be sustained. Since the appellant had already served 13 months 15 days in custody, sufficient for the Sections 323 and 341 sentences, he was discharged from bail bond liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2019

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  4. 02-May-2019

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  5. 14-Mar-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/304/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Mane Kharia v. State of Jharkhand Cr.A(SJ) /304/2019 | Jharkhand High Court | May 5, 2026 The High Court partially allowed the appeal, upholding conviction under IPC Sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restraint) but quashing the conviction under Section 324 (voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapon). The court found that while the appellant used a lathi (which is not a dangerous weapon) and caused only simple injuries without grievous harm, conviction under Section 324 could not be sustained. Since the appellant had already served 13 months 15 days in custody, sufficient for the Sections 323 and 341 sentences, he was discharged from bail bond liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case