TAJMUL ANSARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJESH KUMAR — B.A./2759/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),61(2),BNS,66(B),66(C),66(D),84(C),IT,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010090962026

Filing Number

B.A./5900/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

B.A./2759/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Information Technology Act, 2000 ( 208 )

Sub-Category

Cyber Crime ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),61(2),BNS,66(B),66(C),66(D),84(C),IT,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TAJMUL ANSARI

    Adv. ANKIT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJESH KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Tajmul Ansari, accused of cybercrime offenses involving money transactions linked to his mobile number, on the principle of parity since a similarly situated co-accused was already granted bail by another bench with identical allegations and evidence. He was released on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including mandatory court attendance, deposit of Aadhar details, and cooperation with proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Orders

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 08-May-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./2759/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Tajmul Ansari, accused of cybercrime offenses involving money transactions linked to his mobile number, on the principle of parity since a similarly situated co-accused was already granted bail by another bench with identical allegations and evidence. He was released on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including mandatory court attendance, deposit of Aadhar details, and cooperation with proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case