ALOK BARIYAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA — Cr.A(SJ)/343/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 13(2),13(I),(c),13(I),(d),PC,ACT. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010090292026
Filing Number
Cr.A(SJ)/5845/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
Cr.A(SJ)/343/2026
Registration Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL RIGHTS ( 114 )
Sub-Category
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Preven.of Atrocities)Act,1989 ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALOK BARIYAR
Adv. PRAVEEN SHANKAR DAYAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA
-
2.INDU SHEKHAR JHA
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jun-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
Case Summary: Cr.A(SJ) /343/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the consolidated criminal appeals to June 23, 2026, after finding that the State could not identify specific crimes or victims under SC/ST (PoA) Act charges against the appellants, though they remained in custody. In a related interlocutory application, provisional bail was granted to appellant Kumari Ratnakar for one month on Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, considering her seven-year-old disabled daughter's need for maternal care. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
-
08-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/343/2026
Case Summary: Cr.A(SJ) /343/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the consolidated criminal appeals to June 23, 2026, after finding that the State could not identify specific crimes or victims under SC/ST (PoA) Act charges against the appellants, though they remained in custody. In a related interlocutory application, provisional bail was granted to appellant Kumari Ratnakar for one month on Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, considering her seven-year-old disabled daughter's need for maternal care. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts