VIJAY YADAV vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANAT KUMAR JHA — Cr.A(SJ)/294/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 323,341,IPC,3(1)(x)(s),SC/ST(POA),ACT. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010089302026

Filing Number

Cr.A(SJ)/5781/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

Cr.A(SJ)/294/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL RIGHTS ( 114 )

Sub-Category

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Preven.of Atrocities)Act,1989 ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 323,341,IPC,3(1)(x)(s),SC/ST(POA),ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY YADAV

    Adv. TANU KUMARI

  2. 2.BHOLA KUMAR YADAV

  3. 3.SUJIT YADAV @ SUCHIT KUMAR ALIAS SUCHIT KUMAR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANAT KUMAR JHA

  2. 2.BINOD GANJHU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.A(SJ) No.294/2026 The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the appellants' criminal appeal seeking anticipatory bail in an SC/ST atrocities case involving allegations under IPC Sections 323 & 341 and SC/ST (PoA) Act Section 3(1)(X)(s). Justice Rajesh Kumar rejected the bail plea, noting this was a second attempt without justification, and upheld the earlier rejection (July 2024) citing that Section 18 of the SC/ST (PoA) Act prohibits anticipatory bail when atrocity allegations appear substantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/294/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.A(SJ) No.294/2026 The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the appellants' criminal appeal seeking anticipatory bail in an SC/ST atrocities case involving allegations under IPC Sections 323 & 341 and SC/ST (PoA) Act Section 3(1)(X)(s). Justice Rajesh Kumar rejected the bail plea, noting this was a second attempt without justification, and upheld the earlier rejection (July 2024) citing that Section 18 of the SC/ST (PoA) Act prohibits anticipatory bail when atrocity allegations appear substantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case