PRAMOD JAISWAL ALIAS PRAMOD KUMAR JAISWAL vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - LAXMI MURMU — Cr.M.P./794/2026

Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010089162025

Filing Number

W.P.(Cr.)/6022/2025

Filing Date

12-Mar-2025

Registration No

Cr.M.P./794/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )

Sub-Category

Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAMOD JAISWAL ALIAS PRAMOD KUMAR JAISWAL

    Adv. AYUSH DEB,JASVINDAR MAZUMDAR,JASVINDAR MAZUMDAR, ,JAZEB IQBAL,ROHAN MAZUMDAR,NEEHARIKA MAZUMDAR,JASVINDAR MAZUMDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - LAXMI MURMU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  4. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 794/2026 Decision: The Jharkhand High Court allowed the petition and quashed the entire criminal proceeding (S.T. Case No. 153/2025) arising from the second FIR against petitioner Pramod Jaiswal. The court found that the second FIR (Mandu P.S. Case No. 171/2023) was impermissible because the ammunition recovery offense arose as a consequence of the first FIR (Case No. 170/2023) involving alleged illegal boundary demolition and shooting incidents, making both FIRs based on the same substratum. Key Reasoning: Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court held that a second FIR cannot be registered for offenses arising from the same transaction, and mere addition of charges in a subsequent FIR does not justify its validity. Continuation of proceedings based on the illegal second FIR constituted abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  7. 17-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  9. 02-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  10. 02-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 12-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./794/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 794/2026 Decision: The Jharkhand High Court allowed the petition and quashed the entire criminal proceeding (S.T. Case No. 153/2025) arising from the second FIR against petitioner Pramod Jaiswal. The court found that the second FIR (Mandu P.S. Case No. 171/2023) was impermissible because the ammunition recovery offense arose as a consequence of the first FIR (Case No. 170/2023) involving alleged illegal boundary demolition and shooting incidents, making both FIRs based on the same substratum. Key Reasoning: Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court held that a second FIR cannot be registered for offenses arising from the same transaction, and mere addition of charges in a subsequent FIR does not justify its validity. Continuation of proceedings based on the illegal second FIR constituted abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case