AMAR MANDAL vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT Advocate - AMIT KUMAR DAS — W.P.(Cr.)/231/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010087782026

Filing Number

W.P.(Cr.)/5692/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

W.P.(Cr.)/231/2026

Registration Date

16-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LOTTERY ( 148 )

Sub-Category

Prevention of Money Laundering Act. ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMAR MANDAL

    Adv. APRAJITA BHARDWAJ,KUSHAL KUMAR,KUSHAL KUMAR, ,TEJASWITA SAFALTA,SAMEER SAHAY,TANYA SINGH,AMRITA SINGH,KUSHAL KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT Advocate - AMIT KUMAR DAS

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan PrasadView PDF

  3. 13-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan PrasadView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand allowed the interim application and directed the Directorate of Enforcement to stay proceedings against petitioner Amar Mandal in ECIR/RNZO/08/2023 without Court's leave. The Court held that following Supreme Court precedent (Vijay Madanlal Choudhary and Pavana Dibbur cases), since the petitioner was acquitted in the underlying predicate offence, the PMLA investigation cannot proceed as there is no "proceeds of crime." The main writ petition was listed for regular hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-May-2026

    Orders(with defect)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad

  5. 13-May-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan PrasadView PDF

  7. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan PrasadView PDF

  8. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. W.P.(Cr.)/231/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand allowed the interim application and directed the Directorate of Enforcement to stay proceedings against petitioner Amar Mandal in ECIR/RNZO/08/2023 without Court's leave. The Court held that following Supreme Court precedent (Vijay Madanlal Choudhary and Pavana Dibbur cases), since the petitioner was acquitted in the underlying predicate offence, the PMLA investigation cannot proceed as there is no "proceeds of crime." The main writ petition was listed for regular hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case