KALAWATI DEVI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NEHALA SHARMIN — Cr.M.P./846/2022

Case under An Application U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 406,420,34,IPC. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: JHHC010087182022

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./7047/2022

Filing Date

14-03-2022

Registration No

Cr.M.P./846/2022

Registration Date

29-03-2022

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Quashing Matter ( 206 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Entire Criminal Proceedings ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 406,420,34,IPC

Petitioner(s)

KALAWATI DEVI

Adv. RAHUL KUMAR,APOORVA SINGH,APOORVA SINGH, ,APOORVA SINGH

SMT KANTI DEVI ALIAS KUNTI DEVI

NAVIN KUMAR

PARVEEN KUMAR

TAPILAL RAM

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NEHALA SHARMIN

FULCHAND SAW

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

27-07-2022

LAWAZIMA

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand allowed an interlocutory application to delete petitioner no. 5 from the case as he was neither charge-sheeted nor cognizance was taken against him. The petitioners were directed to file a consolidated criminal miscellaneous petition with the correct party position. The main petition (Cr.M.P. No. 846 of 2022) was adjourned for one week as the petitioner's counsel was granted time as a final opportunity to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand allowed an interlocutory application to delete petitioner no. 5 from the case as he was neither charge-sheeted nor cognizance was taken against him. The petitioners were directed to file a consolidated criminal miscellaneous petition with the correct party position. The main petition (Cr.M.P. No. 846 of 2022) was adjourned for one week as the petitioner's counsel was granted time as a final opportunity to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case