PRAMOD KUMAR CHOUDHARY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN, ,ASTHA TRIPATHI,ABHAY PRAKASH,SANJAY PIPRAWALL,KUMAR HARSH — Cont.(Cvl)/356/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010086702026

Filing Number

Cont.(Cvl)/3042/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

Cont.(Cvl)/356/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 118 )

Sub-Category

Contempt of Courts Act 1971 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 15-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAMOD KUMAR CHOUDHARY

    Adv. SHRESTH GAUTAM,OMPRAKASH,OMPRAKASH, ,HIMANSHU HARSH,RAHUL ANAND,OMPRAKASH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN, ,ASTHA TRIPATHI,ABHAY PRAKASH,SANJAY PIPRAWALL,KUMAR HARSH

  2. 2.DR. PRANITA, REGISTRAR, VINOBA BHAVE UNIVERSITY, HAZARIBAGH

  3. 3.SANDIP KUMAR, SECRETARY, JHARKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Summary: In Contempt (Civil) Case No. 356 of 2026, the High Court of Jharkhand granted six weeks' time to the opposite party to comply with the Court's order, as requested by the petitioner. The case was adjourned with this extension period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cont.(Cvl)/356/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Contempt (Civil) Case No. 356 of 2026, the High Court of Jharkhand granted six weeks' time to the opposite party to comply with the Court's order, as requested by the petitioner. The case was adjourned with this extension period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case