MUBARAK HUSSAIN vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, ,NIVEDITA KUNDU — Cr.A(SJ)/306/2019
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010085992019
Filing Number
Cr.A(SJ)/6230/2019
Filing Date
11-Mar-2019
Registration No
Cr.A(SJ)/306/2019
Registration Date
23-Mar-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
Section 374(2) & 389(1) 389(2) ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUBARAK HUSSAIN
Adv. BINOD KR DUBEY,ABHIJEET KUMAR PANDEY,ABHIJEET KUMAR PANDEY, ,NAWIN KUMAR,ARVIND PRAJAPATI,ABHIJEET KUMAR PANDEY
-
2.MD MUMTAZ ANSARI
-
3.MAHBOOB ALAM
-
4.BABLOO ANSARI ALIAS BABLU MIAN
-
5.SAHBAN ANSARI ALIAS SAHBAN MIAN
-
6.KARAMAT ANSARI ALIAS KARAMAT MIYAN
-
7.KUDUS MIAN
-
8.RAHMAT ALI ALIAS RAHMAT MIAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, ,NIVEDITA KUNDU
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
Case Summary: In Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No. 306 of 2019, the High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the matter on 05.05.2026. The court ordered appellants Mubarak Hussain, Md Mumtaz Ansari, and Mahboob Alam to prepare and deposit the paper book at their own cost within two days. The case was then scheduled for hearing after the summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Jul-2019
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anant Bijay SinghView PDF
-
23-Jul-2019
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anant Bijay SinghView PDF
-
02-May-2019
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
11-Mar-2019
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/306/2019
Case Summary: In Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No. 306 of 2019, the High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the matter on 05.05.2026. The court ordered appellants Mubarak Hussain, Md Mumtaz Ansari, and Mahboob Alam to prepare and deposit the paper book at their own cost within two days. The case was then scheduled for hearing after the summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts