VISHAL KUMAR SHUKLA ALIAS VISHAL SHUKLA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ABHAY KR TIWARI — Cr.M.P./1736/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 109(I),352,351(I),3(5),BNS,27,ARMS,ACT. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010085612026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./5565/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1736/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )

Sub-Category

Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 109(I),352,351(I),3(5),BNS,27,ARMS,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHAL KUMAR SHUKLA ALIAS VISHAL SHUKLA

    Adv. ARUN KUMAR,AWANISH SHEKHAR,AWANISH SHEKHAR, ,AWANISH SHEKHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ABHAY KR TIWARI

  2. 2.SANTOSH KUMAR MEHTA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.1736/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued a preliminary order directing notice to opposite party No.2. The petitioner was ordered to file service requisites within four weeks via speed post and court process, failing which the petition would be dismissed. The rule was made returnable in six weeks, with case listing contingent on receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./1736/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.1736/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued a preliminary order directing notice to opposite party No.2. The petitioner was ordered to file service requisites within four weeks via speed post and court process, failing which the petition would be dismissed. The rule was made returnable in six weeks, with case listing contingent on receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case