MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA ALIAS PAPPU vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILESH KR SINHA — Cr.M.P./1227/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010084612026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./5527/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1227/2026

Registration Date

23-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

Restoration ( 18 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA ALIAS PAPPU

    Adv. SHEO KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILESH KR SINHA

  2. 2.MOTI PRASAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand allowed Manoj Kumar Gupta's petition to restore Criminal Revision No.19200 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non-compliance with a peremptory order dated 18.12.2025. The court found sufficient grounds for restoration after the petitioner's counsel submitted that surviving defects would be cured once the revision petition was restored. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 01-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./1227/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand allowed Manoj Kumar Gupta's petition to restore Criminal Revision No.19200 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non-compliance with a peremptory order dated 18.12.2025. The court found sufficient grounds for restoration after the petitioner's counsel submitted that surviving defects would be cured once the revision petition was restored. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case