KRISHNA KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANURADHA SAHAY, ,VISHAL SRIVASTAVA — A.B.A./1802/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 498(A),IPC. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010084542026

Filing Number

A.B.A./5522/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./1802/2026

Registration Date

28-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 498(A),IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHNA KUMAR

    Adv. MATINUDDIN KHAN,SARFARAZ AKHTAR,SARFARAZ AKHTAR, ,SARFARAZ AKHTAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANURADHA SAHAY, ,VISHAL SRIVASTAVA

  2. 2.ARCHNA KUMARI ALIAS PUJA KUMARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    Krishna Kumar's anticipatory bail application was dismissed by the Jharkhand High Court. The court found no basis for granting anticipatory bail since no non-bailable warrant had been issued against the petitioner in the dowry harassment case (IPC §498A); the petitioner had merely been summoned and was required to comply with the summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./1802/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Krishna Kumar's anticipatory bail application was dismissed by the Jharkhand High Court. The court found no basis for granting anticipatory bail since no non-bailable warrant had been issued against the petitioner in the dowry harassment case (IPC §498A); the petitioner had merely been summoned and was required to comply with the summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case