VAARUN BAGARIA ALIAS VARUN BAGARIA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA, ,JASVINDAR MAZUMDAR,NEEHARIKA MAZUMDAR — Cr.M.P./827/2025

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 406,420,120B,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010084412025

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./5705/2025

Filing Date

10-Mar-2025

Registration No

Cr.M.P./827/2025

Registration Date

27-Mar-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Quashing Matter ( 206 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Entire Criminal Proceedings ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 406,420,120B,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VAARUN BAGARIA ALIAS VARUN BAGARIA

    Adv. RISHABH KAUSHAL,SHREYA SINGH,SHREYA SINGH, ,ABHILASH KUMAR,YASHVARDHAN,RITESH SINGH,MOHINI PRIYA,KAUSHIKI MISHRA,KIRTIVARDHAN,ADITYA AMAN,PRATAYKSHA BHASKAR,SHREYA SINGH

  2. 2.PRADEEP KUMAR BAGARIA

  3. 3.SAROJ KUMAR BAGARIA

  4. 4.RAJ KUMAR BAGARIA

  5. 5.SHAMBHU NATH SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA, ,JASVINDAR MAZUMDAR,NEEHARIKA MAZUMDAR

  2. 2.CHANDAN KUMAR GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.827/2025 Decision: The Jharkhand High Court quashed the cognizance order dated 10.02.2023 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Giridih, in a criminal case involving charges of criminal breach of trust, cheating, and criminal conspiracy (IPC Sections 406, 420, 120B) against five petitioners. Key Reasoning: The court found that the dispute was essentially private in nature with civil flavor, and the parties had reached a complete settlement through a memorandum of understanding. Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court determined that continuation of criminal proceedings would constitute abuse of process, as conviction was now remote and bleak given the full settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 18-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  8. 18-Nov-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  9. 11-Nov-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  10. 04-Nov-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  11. 14-Oct-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  12. 07-Oct-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  13. 23-Sep-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  14. 16-Sep-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  15. 09-Sep-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  16. 02-Sep-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  17. 26-Aug-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  18. 24-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  19. 25-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 10-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./827/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.827/2025 Decision: The Jharkhand High Court quashed the cognizance order dated 10.02.2023 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Giridih, in a criminal case involving charges of criminal breach of trust, cheating, and criminal conspiracy (IPC Sections 406, 420, 120B) against five petitioners. Key Reasoning: The court found that the dispute was essentially private in nature with civil flavor, and the parties had reached a complete settlement through a memorandum of understanding. Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court determined that continuation of criminal proceedings would constitute abuse of process, as conviction was now remote and bleak given the full settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case