NAGESHWAR RAM @ PRADIP RAVIDAS vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - GAUTAM RAKESH — A.B.A./2003/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 74,333,BNS,7/8,POCSO,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010083272026

Filing Number

A.B.A./5462/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2003/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )

Sub-Category

Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 74,333,BNS,7/8,POCSO,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAGESHWAR RAM @ PRADIP RAVIDAS

    Adv. VANI KUMARI,MANISHA SHAILY NAG,MANISHA SHAILY NAG, ,PRINCE PANDEY,JAGRITI,MANISHA SHAILY NAG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - GAUTAM RAKESH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the petition filed by Nageshwar Ram as withdrawn with liberty to pursue alternative remedies. The petitioner's counsel noted that process under Sections 83 and 84 of the BNSS had already been issued in the underlying criminal case and sought withdrawal, which the State did not oppose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2003/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the petition filed by Nageshwar Ram as withdrawn with liberty to pursue alternative remedies. The petitioner's counsel noted that process under Sections 83 and 84 of the BNSS had already been issued in the underlying criminal case and sought withdrawal, which the State did not oppose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case