BINOD KUMAR MAHTO ALIAS BINOD MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - KUMARI RASHMI — B.A./2406/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 111,317(4),317(5),338,336(3),318(4),340(2),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 25th March 2026.
CNR: JHHC010082532026
Filing Number
B.A./5401/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
B.A./2406/2026
Registration Date
20-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BINOD KUMAR MAHTO ALIAS BINOD MAHTO
Adv. TANISQA,PRATYAY BHASKAR,PRATYAY BHASKAR, ,RAHUL KUMAR,VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA,PRATYAY BHASKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - KUMARI RASHMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan PrasadView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Binod Kumar Mahto in a motorcycle theft case, finding no specific attributability in the FIR and noting that no motorcycle was recovered from his possession despite his criminal antecedent. The court ordered his release on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties, relying partly on the fact that co-accused persons had already been granted bail by the same court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./2406/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Binod Kumar Mahto in a motorcycle theft case, finding no specific attributability in the FIR and noting that no motorcycle was recovered from his possession despite his criminal antecedent. The court ordered his release on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties, relying partly on the fact that co-accused persons had already been granted bail by the same court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts