ASHOK MAHTO ALIAS ASHOK KUMAR ALIAS ASHOK KR. MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH KUMAR SINHA — B.A./2505/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302,34,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 15th April 2026.
CNR: JHHC010081242026
Filing Number
B.A./5341/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
B.A./2505/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 22-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHOK MAHTO ALIAS ASHOK KUMAR ALIAS ASHOK KR. MAHTO
Adv. ASHIM KR SAHANI, ,SANKET KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH KUMAR SINHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court rejected Ashok Mahto's bail application in a murder case (IPC Sections 302/34) where he has been in custody since January 2023. The court found that since his previous bail application was already rejected on merit and the trial is at an advanced stage with 9 of 13 witnesses already examined, bail was not warranted; the court directed the State to expedite witness production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
26-Mar-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./2505/2026
The Jharkhand High Court rejected Ashok Mahto's bail application in a murder case (IPC Sections 302/34) where he has been in custody since January 2023. The court found that since his previous bail application was already rejected on merit and the trial is at an advanced stage with 9 of 13 witnesses already examined, bail was not warranted; the court directed the State to expedite witness production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts