AJIT KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NEHALA SHARMIN — A.B.A./1800/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 467,468,471,420,409,34,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010080872026

Filing Number

A.B.A./5314/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./1800/2026

Registration Date

28-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 467,468,471,420,409,34,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJIT KUMAR

    Adv. MANISH YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NEHALA SHARMIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    Case Summary: A.B.A. No. 1800 of 2026 Decision: The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Ajit Kumar's anticipatory bail petition. The court found the allegations of tampering with Register-II at Tandwa Circle Office serious enough to warrant denying bail protection, despite the petitioner's argument that he held a lower position than the co-accused and that charges were allegedly false. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./1800/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: A.B.A. No. 1800 of 2026 Decision: The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Ajit Kumar's anticipatory bail petition. The court found the allegations of tampering with Register-II at Tandwa Circle Office serious enough to warrant denying bail protection, despite the petitioner's argument that he held a lower position than the co-accused and that charges were allegedly false. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case