JITENDRA YADAV @ JITENDRA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANURADHA SAHAY, ,DIVYA CHOUDHARY,ROHAN MAZUMDAR,NAVEEN KUMAR,JASVINDAR MAZUMDAR — Cr.A(SJ)/250/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 118(1),118(2),109(1),352,351(3),127(2),3(5),BNS,3(1)(r),3(1)(s),SCSTPOA,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010080852026
Filing Number
Cr.A(SJ)/5313/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
Cr.A(SJ)/250/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL RIGHTS ( 114 )
Sub-Category
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Preven.of Atrocities)Act,1989 ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JITENDRA YADAV @ JITENDRA
Adv. RAJ NANDAN CHATTERJEE,PRIYA SAW,PRIYA SAW, ,ARYAN,JUHI KUMARI,PRIYA SAW
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANURADHA SAHAY, ,DIVYA CHOUDHARY,ROHAN MAZUMDAR,NAVEEN KUMAR,JASVINDAR MAZUMDAR
-
2.RAVI PASI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Jitendra Yadav against the State of Jharkhand and Ravi Pasi after the appellant's counsel sought permission to withdraw it. No objections were raised by the other parties, and the court granted the withdrawal, disposing of all pending interlocutory applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/250/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Jitendra Yadav against the State of Jharkhand and Ravi Pasi after the appellant's counsel sought permission to withdraw it. No objections were raised by the other parties, and the court granted the withdrawal, disposing of all pending interlocutory applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts