GULAB ANSARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P. — B.A./2288/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 414,419,420,467,468,471,120B,IPC,66B,66C,66D,IT,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010080392026

Filing Number

B.A./5268/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

B.A./2288/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Information Technology Act, 2000 ( 208 )

Sub-Category

Cyber Crime ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 414,419,420,467,468,471,120B,IPC,66B,66C,66D,IT,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GULAB ANSARI

    Adv. RAHUL RANJAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar SrivastavaView PDF

    Summary of B.A. No. 2288 of 2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Gulab Ansari, accused in a cyber crime case involving cheating and IT Act violations. The court found Ansari's case stood on better footing than similarly situated co-accused who had already been released on bail, noting weak implication evidence against him. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 20,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./2288/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of B.A. No. 2288 of 2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Gulab Ansari, accused in a cyber crime case involving cheating and IT Act violations. The court found Ansari's case stood on better footing than similarly situated co-accused who had already been released on bail, noting weak implication evidence against him. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 20,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case