VIJAY MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJESH KUMAR — B.A./2362/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 147,148,149,427,379,354,323,324,307,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010080342026
Filing Number
B.A./5264/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
B.A./2362/2026
Registration Date
19-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJAY MAHTO
Adv. JASVINDAR MAZUMDAR,NAVEEN KUMAR,NAVEEN KUMAR, ,ROHAN MAZUMDAR,NEEHARIKA MAZUMDAR,RAJARSHI SARKAR,NAVEEN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJESH KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to petitioner Vijay Mahto in connection with Jarmundi P.S. Case No. 67 of 2024, directing his release on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. The court found the petitioner's case similar to that of co-accused Rajendra Mahto, who had been granted bail, and considered that the petitioner had been in custody since October 19, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./2362/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to petitioner Vijay Mahto in connection with Jarmundi P.S. Case No. 67 of 2024, directing his release on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. The court found the petitioner's case similar to that of co-accused Rajendra Mahto, who had been granted bail, and considered that the petitioner had been in custody since October 19, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts