TENUGHAT VIDYUT NIGAM LTD. THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY NAMELY JAGNATH TUTI vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COAL Advocate - PRASHANT PALLAV — JHHC10080032026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010080032026

Filing Number

C.M.P./2753/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TENUGHAT VIDYUT NIGAM LTD. THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY NAMELY JAGNATH TUTI

    Adv. SAHBAJ AKHTAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COAL Advocate - PRASHANT PALLAV

  2. 2.THE NOMINATED AUTHORITY, MIN OF COAL

  3. 3.THE JHARKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPTT OF REVENUE

  4. 4.THE SECRETARY, DEPTT OF FOREST

  5. 5.THE MINES COMMISSIONER, DIRECTORATE OF MINES

  6. 6.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BOKARO

  7. 7.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DUMKA

  8. 8.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SERAIKELLA KHARSAWAN

  9. 9.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHAIBASA

  10. 10.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEOGHAR

  11. 11.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, LOHARDAGA

  12. 12.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, LATEHAR

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the petition's mention as an abuse of the mentioning facility, noting it was filed only because the matter was posted before the Tribunal for evidence. The court directed the matter to proceed in its regular turn without adjournment, with the petitioner's counsel assuring the court that no adjournment would be sought on the ground that the matter is pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Orders(with defect)

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the petition's mention as an abuse of the mentioning facility, noting it was filed only because the matter was posted before the Tribunal for evidence. The court directed the matter to proceed in its regular turn without adjournment, with the petitioner's counsel assuring the court that no adjournment would be sought on the ground that the matter is pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case