SANJEEV KUMAR PANDA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AJAY KR PATHAK, ,RAKESH KUMAR — B.A./2434/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302,201,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed As Not Pressed on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010078632026

Filing Number

B.A./5157/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

B.A./2434/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed As Not Pressed

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302,201,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJEEV KUMAR PANDA

    Adv. SOURAV RAJ SHARMA,SHAILESH PODDAR,SHAILESH PODDAR, ,XENIA DHAR,ROHIT RANJAN PRASAD,SHASHANK SHEKHAR No.3,SHAILESH PODDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AJAY KR PATHAK, ,RAKESH KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan PrasadView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court dismissed petitioner Sanjeev Kumar Panda's bail application as not pressed after his counsel withdrew it, following the informant's assurance to appear for trial upon receiving summons. The court directed the lower court to issue summons to remaining witnesses, as only 6 of 12 charge-sheeted witnesses have been examined so far. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./2434/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court dismissed petitioner Sanjeev Kumar Panda's bail application as not pressed after his counsel withdrew it, following the informant's assurance to appear for trial upon receiving summons. The court directed the lower court to issue summons to remaining witnesses, as only 6 of 12 charge-sheeted witnesses have been examined so far. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case