NAVENDU NATH SAHAY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ABHAY KR TIWARI — A.B.A./2021/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(I),341(I),61(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010078402026
Filing Number
A.B.A./5143/2026
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2021/2026
Registration Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 482 ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAVENDU NATH SAHAY
Adv. NAVEEN KUMAR JAISWAL,RANDHIR RANJAN,RANDHIR RANJAN, ,RANDHIR RANJAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ABHAY KR TIWARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Navendu Nath Sahay, a 57-year-old jewellery shop cashier, in a gold embezzlement case involving allegations of manipulation of registers and misrepresentation of gold weights. The court found that since co-accused persons faced identical allegations and had already been granted anticipatory bail, the petitioner deserved equal treatment. Sahay was directed to surrender within two weeks and released on bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
27-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2021/2026
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Navendu Nath Sahay, a 57-year-old jewellery shop cashier, in a gold embezzlement case involving allegations of manipulation of registers and misrepresentation of gold weights. The court found that since co-accused persons faced identical allegations and had already been granted anticipatory bail, the petitioner deserved equal treatment. Sahay was directed to surrender within two weeks and released on bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts