MD. RAFIQUE vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN — JHHC10077342026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010077342026

Filing Number

WPC/2629/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD. RAFIQUE

    Adv. HEMANT KR SHIKARWAR,PRIYANKA,PRIYANKA, ,TUSHAR,AMAN DEEP,MALAY CHAKRAPANI,PRIYANKA

  2. 2.DANISH AHMED

  3. 3.ASLAM PERVEZ

  4. 4.SHAMSHAD AHMAD

  5. 5.BABY NAAZ

  6. 6.AMIN ANSARI

  7. 7.MD. EHSAN

  8. 8.MD. IQBAL

  9. 9.SONIKHATOON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER, NORTH CHOTANAGPUR DIVISION, HAZARIBAGH

  3. 3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HAZARIBAGH

  4. 4.THE KHASMAHAL OFFICER, HAZARIBAGH

  5. 5.THE LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COLLECTOR, HAZARIBAGH

  6. 6.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, HAZARIBAGH

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: The petition filed by Md. Rafique and others was found to be defective and has not been registered by the High Court office. The Court granted three weeks to cure the defects; failure to do so will result in the petition being deemed as never filed, with no further action taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The petition filed by Md. Rafique and others was found to be defective and has not been registered by the High Court office. The Court granted three weeks to cure the defects; failure to do so will result in the petition being deemed as never filed, with no further action taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case