AYAN ANSARI @ SIKANDAR vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH KUMAR SINHA — B.A./2432/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 109,3(5),BNS,27,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010076632026

Filing Number

B.A./5081/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

B.A./2432/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )

Sub-Category

Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 109,3(5),BNS,27,ARMS,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AYAN ANSARI @ SIKANDAR

    Adv. PRIYANKA AGRAWAL,SONAL SODHANI,SONAL SODHANI, ,NILESH KUMAR,TUSHAR AGRAWAL,AYUSH KUMAR VERMA,SONAL SODHANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH KUMAR SINHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan PrasadView PDF

    Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Ayan Ansari in a case involving charges under BNS Sections 109, 3(5) and Arms Act Section 27. The court found that the petitioner was not named in the FIR, no injury was sustained by the informant, and he had been in judicial custody since December 14, 2025 with the chargesheet already filed. Accordingly, bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to cooperation in trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./2432/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Ayan Ansari in a case involving charges under BNS Sections 109, 3(5) and Arms Act Section 27. The court found that the petitioner was not named in the FIR, no injury was sustained by the informant, and he had been in judicial custody since December 14, 2025 with the chargesheet already filed. Accordingly, bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to cooperation in trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case