RAJENDRA KUMAR RAM vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - GAUTAM RAKESH — B.A./2252/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 61(2),/80,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010076542026

Filing Number

B.A./5072/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

B.A./2252/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 61(2),/80,BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA KUMAR RAM

    Adv. ARJUN NARAYAN DEO,KARISHMA KUMARI,KARISHMA KUMARI, ,SUNIL KUMAR RANA,KARISHMA KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - GAUTAM RAKESH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Summary The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail petition of Rajendra Kumar Ram, accused of dowry death under Sections 61(2)/80 of the BNS, 2023. The court found the allegations serious and determined there was a substantial risk of the accused absconding and tampering with evidence, making bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./2252/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail petition of Rajendra Kumar Ram, accused of dowry death under Sections 61(2)/80 of the BNS, 2023. The court found the allegations serious and determined there was a substantial risk of the accused absconding and tampering with evidence, making bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case