SHIV KUMAR SAHU ALIAS CHARKU vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SAKET KUMAR — B.A./2395/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 308(3),324(4),324(5),326(f),111(2),(B),111(4),61(2),3(5),BNS,17,CLA,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 25th March 2026.
CNR: JHHC010076492026
Filing Number
B.A./5069/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
B.A./2395/2026
Registration Date
20-Mar-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHIV KUMAR SAHU ALIAS CHARKU
Adv. VISHAL KUMAR TIWARY,MANJEET KUMAR CHAUDHARY,MANJEET KUMAR CHAUDHARY, ,SHANTANU SINGH,MD. IMRAN BEIG,DEEPAK KUMAR,MANJEET KUMAR CHAUDHARY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SAKET KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to petitioner Shiv Kumar Sahu in a case involving alleged PLFI (People's Liberation Front of India) activities and extortion threats, finding no direct allegation against him in the FIR. The court ordered his release on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with the condition that one surety must be a close relative with sufficient landed property in Jharkhand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./2395/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to petitioner Shiv Kumar Sahu in a case involving alleged PLFI (People's Liberation Front of India) activities and extortion threats, finding no direct allegation against him in the FIR. The court ordered his release on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with the condition that one surety must be a close relative with sufficient landed property in Jharkhand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts