JAGDISH MAHATO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR — Cr.A(SJ)/280/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,126(2),115(2),117(2),109,303(2),324(4),352,BNS,3(1)(r)(s),SC,ST,POA,ACT. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010076372026
Filing Number
Cr.A(SJ)/5061/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
Cr.A(SJ)/280/2026
Registration Date
25-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL RIGHTS ( 114 )
Sub-Category
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Preven.of Atrocities)Act,1989 ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAGDISH MAHATO
Adv. SATAKCHHI PRIYA VERMA,AKASH AJIT KUMAR,AKASH AJIT KUMAR, ,SABI UDDIN,SAMEER SAHAY,TEJASWITA SAFALTA,AKASH AJIT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR
-
2.SUBAL KUMAR DAS
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
Summary: In Criminal Appeal (S.J) No.280 of 2026, the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi issued interim directions on 6th May 2026. The court directed the State's counsel to serve notice on Respondent No.2 through the concerned police station Officer-in-Charge and file an affidavit confirming service. Additionally, the court directed the office to obtain the case diary from the concerned lower court. The appeal remains pending for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/280/2026
Summary: In Criminal Appeal (S.J) No.280 of 2026, the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi issued interim directions on 6th May 2026. The court directed the State's counsel to serve notice on Respondent No.2 through the concerned police station Officer-in-Charge and file an affidavit confirming service. Additionally, the court directed the office to obtain the case diary from the concerned lower court. The appeal remains pending for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts