RUPESH KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA — A.B.A./2324/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 18(c),20(b)(2),25,NDPS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010075042026

Filing Number

A.B.A./4941/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2324/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

DRUGS & MEDICINES ( 125 )

Sub-Category

Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 18(c),20(b)(2),25,NDPS,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RUPESH KUMAR

    Adv. AMAN KUMAR RAHUL,NAND KISHORE RAM,NAND KISHORE RAM, ,SONALI BHATTACHARJEE,NAND KISHORE RAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    Case Summary: A.B.A. 2324/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Rupesh Kumar's second anticipatory bail application in an NDPS Act case (Sections 18(c), 20(b)(2), 25). The court found that deletion of the petitioner's name in another case did not constitute fresh grounds for reconsideration, especially since his earlier application was dismissed with liberty to file regular bail instead. The stringent nature of NDPS charges further weighed against granting anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2324/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: A.B.A. 2324/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Rupesh Kumar's second anticipatory bail application in an NDPS Act case (Sections 18(c), 20(b)(2), 25). The court found that deletion of the petitioner's name in another case did not constitute fresh grounds for reconsideration, especially since his earlier application was dismissed with liberty to file regular bail instead. The stringent nature of NDPS charges further weighed against granting anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case