CHARAN HANSDA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SAKET KUMAR — Cr.A(DB)/343/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 143(4),3(5),BNS,14(1),CHILD,LABOUR,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 15th April 2026.
CNR: JHHC010073552026
Filing Number
Cr.A(DB)/4866/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
Cr.A(DB)/343/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
National Investigation Agency Act ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 22-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHARAN HANSDA
Adv. PRATIUSH LALA,DEEPAK SAHU,DEEPAK SAHU, ,DEEPAK SAHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SAKET KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay,hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar SrivastavaView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court allowed Charan Hansda's bail appeal, setting aside the Sessions Judge's rejection order. The court found the allegations primarily stemmed from a wage dispute over domestic help work in Delhi rather than serious criminal conduct, and considered the appellant's custody period (since December 14, 2025) and clean criminal record. Hansda was granted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
-
08-Apr-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
-
01-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.A(DB)/343/2026
The Jharkhand High Court allowed Charan Hansda's bail appeal, setting aside the Sessions Judge's rejection order. The court found the allegations primarily stemmed from a wage dispute over domestic help work in Delhi rather than serious criminal conduct, and considered the appellant's custody period (since December 14, 2025) and clean criminal record. Hansda was granted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts