RAVI KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR MAHTO — B.A./2203/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 96,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010070882026
Filing Number
B.A./4692/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
B.A./2203/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
12-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 22-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVI KUMAR
Adv. GAUTAM KUMAR,SANJAY KUMAR,SANJAY KUMAR, ,ASHUTOSH KUMAR SINHA,PUSHPANJALI KUMARI,BIRAT KUMAR,ABHINAV RAJ,SANJAY KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR MAHTO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-May-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
Summary The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Ravi Kumar, who was arrested under Section 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in connection with an alleged abduction case. The court found that the alleged victim was born on 01.01.2007 and was therefore a major, and that the victim had eloped with the petitioner rather than being abducted. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court attendance and cooperation with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./2203/2026
Summary The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Ravi Kumar, who was arrested under Section 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in connection with an alleged abduction case. The court found that the alleged victim was born on 01.01.2007 and was therefore a major, and that the victim had eloped with the petitioner rather than being abducted. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court attendance and cooperation with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts