KUMARI DIMPAL VERMA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY Advocate - INDRANIL BHADURI — Cr.M.P./1302/2026
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 111(2)(b),BNS,21(b),25,27,28,29,NDPS,ACT. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010070152026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./4639/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
Cr.M.P./1302/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
DRUGS & MEDICINES ( 125 )
Sub-Category
Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KUMARI DIMPAL VERMA
Adv. ANUPAM ANAND,PRANAV KUMAR,PRANAV KUMAR, ,PRANAV KUMAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY Advocate - INDRANIL BHADURI
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE JHARKHAND
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIOBER CHATRA
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CHATRA
THE A.S.I.-CUM-OFFICER-IN-CHARGE CHATRA SADAR POLICE STATION
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Orders
Fresh Filing (Admission)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Orders |
| 04-05-2026 | Fresh Filing (Admission) |
Orders
In Cr.M.P. No. 1302/2026, the High Court of Jharkhand rejected two interlocutory applications (I.A. Nos. 4373 and 3134 of 2026) as not pressed by petitioner's counsel. On the main petition, the court issued notice to opposite parties 2-5 and directed the petitioner to file requisites within two weeks, failing which the petition would be dismissed. The notice was made returnable within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In Cr.M.P. No. 1302/2026, the High Court of Jharkhand rejected two interlocutory applications (I.A. Nos. 4373 and 3134 of 2026) as not pressed by petitioner's counsel. On the main petition, the court issued notice to opposite parties 2-5 and directed the petitioner to file requisites within two weeks, failing which the petition would be dismissed. The notice was made returnable within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts