SUNIL SINGH vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MOHUA PALIT — Cr.A(SJ)/282/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),74,76,329(4),303(2),352,351(2),(3),3(5),,3,4,SC/ST,POA,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010069872026

Filing Number

Cr.A(SJ)/4612/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

Cr.A(SJ)/282/2026

Registration Date

26-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL RIGHTS ( 114 )

Sub-Category

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Preven.of Atrocities)Act,1989 ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),74,76,329(4),303(2),352,351(2),(3),3(5),,3,4,SC/ST,POA,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL SINGH

    Adv. SHREE NIVAS ROY

  2. 2.MOTAR SINGH @ MATAR SINGH @ MADHUSUDAN SINGH

  3. 3.TINKU SINGH

  4. 4.DEEPAK SINGH

  5. 5.CHAMPA DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MOHUA PALIT

  2. 2.XXXX

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.A(SJ) No.282/2026 The Jharkhand High Court rejected the anticipatory bail appeal filed by five appellants (Sunil Singh, Motar Singh, Tinku Singh, Deepak Singh, and Champa Devi) in a case involving allegations under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and multiple sections of the BNS 2023. Justice Rajesh Kumar held that Section 18 of the SC/ST (PoA) Act bars the court's jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail when offences under the Act are made out, and since the police investigation found the allegations credible enough to file a charge-sheet, the appeal was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/282/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.A(SJ) No.282/2026 The Jharkhand High Court rejected the anticipatory bail appeal filed by five appellants (Sunil Singh, Motar Singh, Tinku Singh, Deepak Singh, and Champa Devi) in a case involving allegations under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and multiple sections of the BNS 2023. Justice Rajesh Kumar held that Section 18 of the SC/ST (PoA) Act bars the court's jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail when offences under the Act are made out, and since the police investigation found the allegations credible enough to file a charge-sheet, the appeal was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case