MUSTAFA ALAM @ FARHAN @ MONU vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANURADHA SAHAY — B.A./2416/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 108(3),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010069492026

Filing Number

B.A./4594/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

B.A./2416/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 108(3),3(5),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUSTAFA ALAM @ FARHAN @ MONU

    Adv. SONAL PANDEY,NILESH KUMAR,NILESH KUMAR, ,AYUSH KUMAR VERMA,PRIYANKA AGRAWAL,SONAL SODHANI,NILESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANURADHA SAHAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Mustafa Alam, who was accused under Sections 108(3) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Sanhita in connection with a woman's suicide. The court found the evidence against him insufficient, noting only that there was prior intimacy, a phone call before her death, and a suicide note mentioning his name. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with one surety required to be a close relative having landed property in Jharkhand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./2416/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Mustafa Alam, who was accused under Sections 108(3) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Sanhita in connection with a woman's suicide. The court found the evidence against him insufficient, noting only that there was prior intimacy, a phone call before her death, and a suicide note mentioning his name. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with one surety required to be a close relative having landed property in Jharkhand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case