SANJAY KUMAR vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA — Cr.M.P./1343/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010069412026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./4589/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1343/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

Restoration ( 18 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY KUMAR

    Adv. MD SHARUKH ANSARI,MD FARUQUE ANSARI,MD FARUQUE ANSARI, ,MD FARUQUE ANSARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA

  2. 2.KAPILDEV PRASAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand restored Criminal Revision (Filing) No. 23271 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non-compliance with an order dated 18.12.2025. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the surrender certificate was inadvertently not filed within the stipulated time, but the petitioner had already surrendered before the court. The State raised no serious objection, and the court granted the restoration on these grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./1343/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand restored Criminal Revision (Filing) No. 23271 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non-compliance with an order dated 18.12.2025. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the surrender certificate was inadvertently not filed within the stipulated time, but the petitioner had already surrendered before the court. The State raised no serious objection, and the court granted the restoration on these grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case