KAIF ALI ALLIAS MD KAIF vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - V.S.SAHAY — B.A./2407/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 304(2),317(2),317(4),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010068172026

Filing Number

B.A./4513/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

B.A./2407/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 304(2),317(2),317(4),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAIF ALI ALLIAS MD KAIF

    Adv. RAJESH KR MAHTHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - V.S.SAHAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Kaif Ali, accused of mobile phone and bike theft, after he had been in custody since October 23, 2025. The court considered that the chargesheet had already been filed and the period of custody had been sufficient, ordering his release on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, with one surety being a close relative possessing landed property in Jharkhand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./2407/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Kaif Ali, accused of mobile phone and bike theft, after he had been in custody since October 23, 2025. The court considered that the chargesheet had already been filed and the period of custody had been sufficient, ordering his release on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, with one surety being a close relative possessing landed property in Jharkhand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case