LAW KUMAR TIWARY vs NARAD TIWARY — C.M.P./171/2024
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010067482024
Filing Number
C.M.P./1690/2024
Filing Date
23-Feb-2024
Registration No
C.M.P./171/2024
Registration Date
26-Feb-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
RESTORATION. ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAW KUMAR TIWARY
Adv. SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA
-
2.ASHIRVAD TIWARY
-
3.AMITABH TIWARY
Respondent(s)
-
1.NARAD TIWARY
-
2.SHAMBHU TIWARY
-
3.MUNI TIWARY
-
4.SURESH TIWARY
-
5.UMA DEVI
-
6.PRABHA DEVI
-
7.MALTI DEVE
-
8.ANITA DEVI
-
9.INDA DEVI
-
10.RAM PRATAP TIWARY
-
11.RAM SURAT TIWARY
-
12.RAM VINAY TIWARY
-
13.RAMNATH TIWARY
-
14.KISHORI DEVI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court adjourned the case after finding that notice to Opposite Party No. 14 in the limitation matter was not validly served. The petitioner was directed to file fresh notice requisites via both speed post and court process within four weeks, with the petition to be dismissed if requisites are not filed. The rule is made returnable within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Jan-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
08-Aug-2024
Lawazima
Registrar (Judicial)
-
23-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. C.M.P./171/2024
The Jharkhand High Court adjourned the case after finding that notice to Opposite Party No. 14 in the limitation matter was not validly served. The petitioner was directed to file fresh notice requisites via both speed post and court process within four weeks, with the petition to be dismissed if requisites are not filed. The rule is made returnable within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts