FULO DEVI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MD SHAHABUDDIN — WPC/3278/2026
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010066912026
Filing Number
WPC/2256/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
WPC/3278/2026
Registration Date
01-May-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND ACQUISITION ( 145 )
Sub-Category
CORRECTION IN ONLINE LAND RECORD ( 13 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FULO DEVI
Adv. SWAPAN MAJI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MD SHAHABUDDIN
-
2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, LOHARDAGA
-
3.ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, LOHARDAGA
-
4.DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND REFORMS, LOHARDAGA
-
5.CIRCLE OFFICER, CHAS, SENHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
Case Summary: WPC 3278/2026 - Fulo Devi v. State of Jharkhand The Jharkhand High Court disposed of the petition regarding land record discrepancies. Fulo Devi complained that one plot was not uploaded to the online register and that plot numbers and areas showed discrepancies across online registers, physical registers, and records of rights. The court directed her to approach the Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga with supporting documents, mandating the Deputy Commissioner to examine the records and correct any discrepancies within ten weeks while providing hearing opportunity to all parties and communicating the decision promptly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
09-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3278/2026
Case Summary: WPC 3278/2026 - Fulo Devi v. State of Jharkhand The Jharkhand High Court disposed of the petition regarding land record discrepancies. Fulo Devi complained that one plot was not uploaded to the online register and that plot numbers and areas showed discrepancies across online registers, physical registers, and records of rights. The court directed her to approach the Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga with supporting documents, mandating the Deputy Commissioner to examine the records and correct any discrepancies within ten weeks while providing hearing opportunity to all parties and communicating the decision promptly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts