JAYALAL MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR — WPC/3214/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010066752026

Filing Number

WPC/2240/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

WPC/3214/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Jamabandi ( 229 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYALAL MAHTO

    Adv. RAJESH KR MAHTHA

  2. 2.CHINTAMAN MAHTO

  3. 3.DWARIKA MAHTO

  4. 4.PRAKASH MAHTO

  5. 5.NARAYAN MAHTO

  6. 6.NUNUCHAND MAHTO

  7. 7.JAYLAL MAHTO

  8. 8.KHIRODHAR MAHTO

  9. 9.GHANSHYAM MAHTO

  10. 10.TARKESHWAR MAHTO

  11. 11.BUDHAN MAHTO

  12. 12.PYARI MAHTO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BOKARO

  3. 3.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, NAWADIH BLOCK

  4. 4.THE LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BERMO AT TENUGHAT

  5. 5.SAHEB RAM HEMBROM

  6. 6.MAHESH MANJHI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: WPC/3214/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the writ petition filed by Jayalal Mahto and others against the State of Jharkhand. The court issued notice to respondents 5 & 6 via speed post and ordinary process (requisites to be filed within two weeks) and directed the State to file a counter affidavit. Status quo over the disputed land is maintained pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/3214/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC/3214/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the writ petition filed by Jayalal Mahto and others against the State of Jharkhand. The court issued notice to respondents 5 & 6 via speed post and ordinary process (requisites to be filed within two weeks) and directed the State to file a counter affidavit. Status quo over the disputed land is maintained pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case