ABHISHEK ANAND vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SATISH PRASAD — Cr.Rev./356/2026

Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010066042026

Filing Number

Cr.Rev./4384/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

Cr.Rev./356/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )

Sub-Category

Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABHISHEK ANAND

    Adv. RAHUL RANJAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SATISH PRASAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court allowed Abhishek Anand's criminal revision petition and granted him bail. The court set aside the lower courts' bail rejection orders, finding that while the petitioner was accused of establishing a physical relationship with the victim under the pretext of marriage, he had been in custody since August 2025 and the social investigation report contained no adverse findings regarding his family background or conduct. He was released on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties, with his father as one surety responsible for ensuring his safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  5. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.Rev./356/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court allowed Abhishek Anand's criminal revision petition and granted him bail. The court set aside the lower courts' bail rejection orders, finding that while the petitioner was accused of establishing a physical relationship with the victim under the pretext of marriage, he had been in custody since August 2025 and the social investigation report contained no adverse findings regarding his family background or conduct. He was released on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties, with his father as one surety responsible for ensuring his safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case