MANOJ VERMA ALIAS MANOJ KUMAR VERMA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VIJOY KUMAR SINHA — B.A./2521/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 87,64(I),127,329,351(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010064972026

Filing Number

B.A./4303/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

B.A./2521/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 87,64(I),127,329,351(2),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ VERMA ALIAS MANOJ KUMAR VERMA

    Adv. VIJAY KUMAR ROY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VIJOY KUMAR SINHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court rejected Manoj Verma's bail petition in a case involving charges under BNS sections 87/64(1)/127/329/351(2) related to a 19-year-old victim. The court found the victim's direct allegation against the petitioner, supported by her statement under Section 183 BNSS and medical evidence showing physical injury, sufficiently credible to deny bail, despite the petitioner's claims of false implication and consensual relationship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./2521/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court rejected Manoj Verma's bail petition in a case involving charges under BNS sections 87/64(1)/127/329/351(2) related to a 19-year-old victim. The court found the victim's direct allegation against the petitioner, supported by her statement under Section 183 BNSS and medical evidence showing physical injury, sufficiently credible to deny bail, despite the petitioner's claims of false implication and consensual relationship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case