AJIT KUMAR SETH vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P. — A.B.A./2260/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),BNS,66(C),IT,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010064422026

Filing Number

A.B.A./4269/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2260/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Information Technology Act, 2000 ( 208 )

Sub-Category

Cyber Crime ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),BNS,66(C),IT,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJIT KUMAR SETH

    Adv. CHANDRA S. PANDEY,SANJAY KUMAR,SANJAY KUMAR, ,CHHAYA KUMARI DUBEY,SANJAY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Ajay Kumar Seth's anticipatory bail plea in a case involving allegations under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 66(C) of the Information Technology Act. The petitioner, who runs a Pragya Kendra, claimed false implication, but the court found direct allegations of unauthorized money transfer using the informant's thumb impression on Aadhar and mobile linking, rendering the bail plea unsuitable for grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2260/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Ajay Kumar Seth's anticipatory bail plea in a case involving allegations under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 66(C) of the Information Technology Act. The petitioner, who runs a Pragya Kendra, claimed false implication, but the court found direct allegations of unauthorized money transfer using the informant's thumb impression on Aadhar and mobile linking, rendering the bail plea unsuitable for grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case