SHARAD MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI, ,AJIT KUMAR,VIKESH KUMAR — WPC/2795/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010064402026

Filing Number

WPC/2173/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

WPC/2795/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND ACQUISITION ( 145 )

Sub-Category

RENT RECEIPT ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHARAD MAHTO

    Adv. NEHRU MAHTO,JYOTI LAL MAHTO,JYOTI LAL MAHTO, ,JYOTI LAL MAHTO

  2. 2.SAKHI BALA MAHATO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI, ,AJIT KUMAR,VIKESH KUMAR

  2. 2.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LAND AND REVENUE

  3. 3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, RANCHI

  4. 4.THE LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COLLECTOR, RANCHI

  5. 5.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, SONAHATU

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: WPC/2795/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand allowed an interlocutory application (I.A. No.5950/2026) permitting a proposed intervenor to join the proceedings, finding the intervenor to be a necessary party as the disputed plots are recorded in their name. The petitioners were directed to correct the cause-title and serve the writ petition on the intervenor by week's end. The State and intervenor must file counter-affidavits within four weeks, with the case listed for admission thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  6. 21-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  7. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2795/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC/2795/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand allowed an interlocutory application (I.A. No.5950/2026) permitting a proposed intervenor to join the proceedings, finding the intervenor to be a necessary party as the disputed plots are recorded in their name. The petitioners were directed to correct the cause-title and serve the writ petition on the intervenor by week's end. The State and intervenor must file counter-affidavits within four weeks, with the case listed for admission thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case