SANTOSH MURMU vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR MAHTO — A.B.A./1803/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 25(1-B)(a),26,35,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010063502026
Filing Number
A.B.A./4237/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./1803/2026
Registration Date
28-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )
Sub-Category
Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANTOSH MURMU
Adv. PREM MARDI,MUKESH KUMAR MEHTA,MUKESH KUMAR MEHTA, ,MUKESH KUMAR MEHTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR MAHTO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Case Summary: A.B.A. /1803/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Santosh Murmu, who faced arrest in an Arms Act case (Masalia P.S. Case No. 69/2025) for alleged illegal possession of firearms. The court found merit in the petitioner's arguments that he was not present at the crime spot, weapons were recovered from co-accused persons only, and he was attending Kali Puja when the incident occurred. Murmu was directed to surrender within three weeks and granted bail on furnishing Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
27-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
20-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./1803/2026
Case Summary: A.B.A. /1803/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Santosh Murmu, who faced arrest in an Arms Act case (Masalia P.S. Case No. 69/2025) for alleged illegal possession of firearms. The court found merit in the petitioner's arguments that he was not present at the crime spot, weapons were recovered from co-accused persons only, and he was attending Kali Puja when the incident occurred. Murmu was directed to surrender within three weeks and granted bail on furnishing Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts