RAMCHANDRA SAKUNIA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH COMMISSIONER, NORTH CHHOTANAGPUR DIVISION, HAZARIBAG Advocate - MANOJ KUMAR — WPC/3794/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010062432026

Filing Number

WPC/2079/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

WPC/3794/2026

Registration Date

16-May-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Jamabandi ( 229 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMCHANDRA SAKUNIA

    Adv. SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA,SHASHI SHEKHAR DWIVEDI,SHASHI SHEKHAR DWIVEDI, ,SHASHI SHEKHAR DWIVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH COMMISSIONER, NORTH CHHOTANAGPUR DIVISION, HAZARIBAG Advocate - MANOJ KUMAR

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-CUM-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, CHATRA

  3. 3.THE ADDL. COLLECTOR, CHATRA

  4. 4.THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHATRA

  5. 5.THE LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COLLECTOR, CHATRA

  6. 6.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, CHATRA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: WPC/3794/2026 - Ramchandra Sakunia v. State of Jharkhand The case was adjourned on 10th June 2026. The court directed respondents to file a counter-affidavit within six weeks and listed the matter for admission thereafter. The court also granted interim relief, directing that the disputed land shall not be disbursed if the petitioner remains in possession of it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/3794/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC/3794/2026 - Ramchandra Sakunia v. State of Jharkhand The case was adjourned on 10th June 2026. The court directed respondents to file a counter-affidavit within six weeks and listed the matter for admission thereafter. The court also granted interim relief, directing that the disputed land shall not be disbursed if the petitioner remains in possession of it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case